1Executive summary
Whoever has the better read on lot values controls the negotiation. That read starts with a number nobody publishes: how many buildable single-family lots the region actually produces, and how many are actually coming. This briefing consolidates the title-plant transaction record, a three-county audit of land-use notices, and recorded finished-lot sales into one answer — and the answer is that production has fallen structurally below both its own history and the region's adopted growth targets.
Every figure in this report is dated, sourced, and reproducible from the underlying transaction table. Estimates are labeled as estimates. Headline figures above are pinned to the published July 2, 2026 edition. Charts and tables in this briefing query the live data layer on the published de-duplicated basis and may differ marginally from pinned figures as audited corrections land — members see current values in the portal. The notice-stage pipeline charted in Section 3 is a different measure from the audited forward-entitlement figure above: it spans all notice stages and is early-stage heavy, so its deliverable share is materially lower.
2The production baseline
The transaction record — every preliminary-plat acquisition crossing a title desk since 2019, extended to 2011 for Snohomish — shows three counties on three different paths to the same place. King fell first and furthest, shrinking every year since 2020. Pierce compressed sharply from its own 2020 peak, and roughly half of what remains sits inside a single master-planned community. Snohomish is cyclical rather than collapsing, but its most recent trough ranks among the county's thinnest years on record.
| County | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026* | Total | Peak → 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snohomish | 2,204 | 4,473 | 3,100 | 1,858 | 1,759 | 3,504 | 71 | 16,969 | −21.7% |
| King | 3,699 | 3,549 | 2,978 | 1,862 | 1,952 | 1,398 | 411 | 15,849 | −62.2% |
| Pierce | 1,649 | 903 | 726 | 451 | 559 | 744 | 133 | 5,165 | −54.9% |
| Region — 3 counties | 7,552 | 8,925 | 6,804 | 4,171 | 4,270 | 5,646 | 615 | 37,983 | −36.7% |
2026 is a partial year through the latest ingested month and is never annualized or charted as a full year.
3The forward pipeline
Production history says what happened. The land-use notice record says what's coming. Rebuilding every notice across the three counties — de-duplicated to one record per project, litigation and withdrawn filings excluded — yields a live pipeline distributed across four notice stages. The distribution is the story: a large share sits at pre-application, the stage with the highest fallout rate and the longest path to a recorded lot.
| Snohomish — top cities | Pre-App | Under review | NOA / Hearing | Live pipeline | Mix incl. recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bothell | 1,545 | 1,742 | 2,532 | 5,819 | |
| Marysville | 2,169 | 1,041 | 805 | 4,015 | |
| Lynnwood | 1,910 | 925 | 991 | 3,826 | |
| Snohomish | 2,581 | 537 | 251 | 3,369 | |
| Lake Stevens | 791 | 1,025 | 549 | 2,365 | |
| Everett | 824 | 169 | 485 | 1,478 |
Set the pipeline against history and the imbalance is explicit: the live notice pipeline replaces multi-year county production averages at well under parity in every county audited here. A pipeline total is a floor, not a census — filings that never resolve to a parseable lot count are excluded rather than guessed at.
4What lots cost
Two price series matter, and they are not the same series. Acquisition pricing — what developers pay per proposed lot at the preliminary-plat stage — and finished-lot pricing — what builders pay per recorded, shovel-ready lot. King acquisition pricing has risen even as volume collapsed; Pierce finished lots have climbed steadily since 2019. Intercompany transfers between commonly owned entities are excluded from every $/lot average published here (see the March 2026 data note on the JK Monarch → Trumark cluster).
5Named communities ≥ 100 lots
Every community of 100 lots or more identified in the transaction and notice record, with the verification basis stated per line — the same confidence discipline members see on every record in the data layer.
| Community | County · City | Lots | Stage | Builders (from records) | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tehaleh (Cascadia EBPC) | Pierce · Bonney Lake | ~9,700 at full buildout (~5,000 remaining est.) | Active buildout | Brookfield (dev), Century, MainVue, Lennar, D.R. Horton, Richmond, others | Web-verified |
| Sunrise (Master Planned Community) | Pierce · Puyallup/South Hill | ~5,200 approved; ~900 remaining | Active buildout | KB Home, Richmond American, Century, Lennar, D.R. Horton, Oakridge | Web-verified |
| Ten Trails / Black Diamond (Lawson Hills) | King · Black Diamond | ~4,000 remaining (MPD) | Active buildout | Oakpointe (dev), Lennar, Richmond, Pulte, others | Data + report |
| Lakepointe Urban Village | King · Covington | 1,500 | Pre-Application | Oakpointe Builders | Data + report |
| Eastview Village | Snohomish · Snohomish (uninc., Cathcart) | 1,301–1,320 (574 SF + 360 TH + MF) | ApprovedLitigation | D.R. Horton, Pacific Ridge Homes, Forestar (land) | Web-verified |
| Wolf River | Pierce · Graham | 535 | Pre-Application | Lennar Northwest | Data-derived |
| Avalon Alderwood | Snohomish · Lynnwood | 491 | Unknown | Avalon Alderwood (entity) | Data-derived |
| Brookdale PDD | Pierce · Tacoma | 388 | Pre-Application | Ichijo USA (Japanese builder) | Data-derived |
| Marysville 10 Degrees | Snohomish · Marysville | 335 | Pre-Application | Arroyo Cap IV | Data-derived |
| Villas at Arlington | Snohomish · Arlington | 312 | Permit/Hearing | Villas at Arlington Partners | Data-derived |
| Timber Creek Ranch (PRD) | Snohomish · Bothell | 290 (221 rec.) | Under Review | Toll Brothers | Data-derived |
| Cathcart Crossing | Snohomish · Snohomish (uninc.) | 286 | Under Review | D.R. Horton, Pacific Ridge | Web-verified |
| Mountain Highway East | Pierce · Spanaway | 259 | Pre-Application | Blue Fern Development | Data-derived |
| Wyndham Highlands | Snohomish · Sultan | 213 | Under Review | AG Essential Housing (land bank) | Data-derived |
| SkyRidge Estates | Snohomish · Sultan | 207 | Pre-Application | LGI Homes | Data-derived |
| Diamond Valley Estates | King · Auburn | 202 | Under Review | MainVue | Data-derived |
| Suntop PUD | King · Enumclaw | 174 | Permit/Hearing | LGI Homes | Data-derived |
| Falling Water(s) | Pierce · Bonney Lake | 164 (part of larger KB program) | Permit/Hearing | KB Home | Data + report |
6What this data can and cannot say
Honest qualifications
- Not every land-use notice could be parsed to a lot count. Pipeline figures are audited floors, not censuses.
- Multiple Snohomish lot bases circulate in prior research. This report publishes the de-duplicated basis; a one-page crosswalk reconciles the rest.
- "New construction" counts recordings (a supply proxy); "resale" counts closed sales (demand). Any share statistic mixing the two is labeled where used.
- Prices are stage-blended unless explicitly marked finished-lot. A blended $/lot is not a finished-lot comp.
- 2026 figures are partial-year and are never charted or averaged as full years.
7Sources & methods
- Title-plant transaction record, 2011–2026. Plat-linked acquisitions and finished-lot sales with buyer, seller, and price per lot; stated margin of error ±2%. De-duplication: one record per plat, kept at largest lot count; audited corrections applied.
- County land-use notice registers, King · Pierce · Snohomish. Notice-stage rebuild, de-duplicated to one record per project; per-line confidence tiers (Verified / Partial / Directional).
- NWMLS monthly statistics. Inventory and pending-sale series; reproduced under attribution terms.
- County recorded-deed publications. Independent benchmark for the lot-to-home-price ratio.
- Third-party research informs internal analysis and is cited, not reproduced — license terms apply.
Members search the underlying records — every plat transaction, every finished-lot sale, the full notice-stage pipeline — and export any result set to CSV.