DATA THROUGH JAN–JUN 2026 BY SOURCE · FIVE-COUNTY BUILDER COMMUNITY MAP LAYER INGESTED JUL 10Member sign in
LandmanIQ
Puget Sound Land-Development Intelligence
Regional Briefing · Flagship Report

The Coming Lot Scarcity

Puget Sound platted tens of thousands of residential lots between 2020 and April 2026 — and the trend line points the wrong way. King County production has fallen sharply from its 2019 level, the audited forward pipeline holds a fraction of what the market absorbed at peak, and a notice-stage rebuild shows exactly where — and when — the supply of buildable lots runs thin.

1Executive summary

Whoever has the better read on lot values controls the negotiation. That read starts with a number nobody publishes: how many buildable single-family lots the region actually produces, and how many are actually coming. This briefing consolidates the title-plant transaction record, a three-county audit of land-use notices, and recorded finished-lot sales into one answer — and the answer is that production has fallen structurally below both its own history and the region's adopted growth targets.

38,035
lots platted, 3 counties, 2020 – Apr 2026 (de-duplicated) — as published
−68%
King County production, 2019 → 2025 full year — as published
~17,777
audited forward entitlement pipeline, July 2026 — a floor, not a census

Every figure in this report is dated, sourced, and reproducible from the underlying transaction table. Estimates are labeled as estimates. Headline figures above are pinned to the published July 2, 2026 edition. Charts and tables in this briefing query the live data layer on the published de-duplicated basis and may differ marginally from pinned figures as audited corrections land — members see current values in the portal. The notice-stage pipeline charted in Section 3 is a different measure from the audited forward-entitlement figure above: it spans all notice stages and is early-stage heavy, so its deliverable share is materially lower.

2The production baseline

The transaction record — every preliminary-plat acquisition crossing a title desk since 2019, extended to 2011 for Snohomish — shows three counties on three different paths to the same place. King fell first and furthest, shrinking every year since 2020. Pierce compressed sharply from its own 2020 peak, and roughly half of what remains sits inside a single master-planned community. Snohomish is cyclical rather than collapsing, but its most recent trough ranks among the county's thinnest years on record.

FIG. 1
New lots platted by county, 20202025
Preliminary-plat transactions, de-duplicated basis · full years only
01k2k3k4k5k202020212022202320242025Snohomish 3,504King 1,398Pierce 744
King Snohomish Pierce
Source: title-plant transaction record, LandmanIQ de-duplication. Table 1 carries the exact values.
TABLE 1
Lots platted by county and year
County2020202120222023202420252026*TotalPeak → 2025
Snohomish2,2044,4733,1001,8581,7593,5047116,969−21.7%
King3,6993,5492,9781,8621,9521,39841115,849−62.2%
Pierce1,6499037264515597441335,165−54.9%
Region — 3 counties7,5528,9256,8044,1714,2705,64661537,983−36.7%
*2026 through the latest ingested month — partial year, never annualized.

2026 is a partial year through the latest ingested month and is never annualized or charted as a full year.

3The forward pipeline

Production history says what happened. The land-use notice record says what's coming. Rebuilding every notice across the three counties — de-duplicated to one record per project, litigation and withdrawn filings excluded — yields a live pipeline distributed across four notice stages. The distribution is the story: a large share sits at pre-application, the stage with the highest fallout rate and the longest path to a recorded lot.

FIG. 2
Notice-stage pipeline, three counties
De-duplicated · one record per project · Jul 2, 2026
Pre-Application 26,106Under Review 8,733NOA / Hearing 17,785Recorded 1,985
Snohomish — top citiesPre-AppUnder reviewNOA / HearingLive pipelineMix incl. recorded
Bothell1,5451,7422,5325,819
Marysville2,1691,0418054,015
Lynnwood1,9109259913,826
Snohomish2,5815372513,369
Lake Stevens7911,0255492,365
Everett8241694851,478
Live pipeline excludes recorded lots. The full city table and the King and Pierce equivalents are in the member data layer.

Set the pipeline against history and the imbalance is explicit: the live notice pipeline replaces multi-year county production averages at well under parity in every county audited here. A pipeline total is a floor, not a census — filings that never resolve to a parseable lot count are excluded rather than guessed at.

4What lots cost

Two price series matter, and they are not the same series. Acquisition pricing — what developers pay per proposed lot at the preliminary-plat stage — and finished-lot pricing — what builders pay per recorded, shovel-ready lot. King acquisition pricing has risen even as volume collapsed; Pierce finished lots have climbed steadily since 2019. Intercompany transfers between commonly owned entities are excluded from every $/lot average published here (see the March 2026 data note on the JK Monarch → Trumark cluster).

FIG. 3
Lot pricing by year, 2019–2026 YTD
Lot-weighted average $/lot · same scale within each panel
Acquisition — PPLAT $/proposed lot
0$100.0K$200.0K$300.0K’19’21’23’25’26*King $279.0K*Snohomish $127.3K*
Finished lots — recorded $/lot
0$100.0K$200.0K$300.0K$400.0K$500.0K’19’21’23’25’26*King $300.2K*Pierce $232.1K*
King Snohomish Pierce
*2026 is year-to-date (partial year — never annualized). Intercompany transfers (e.g., the March JK Monarch→Trumark cluster) are excluded from $/lot averages. Snohomish finished-lot pricing is stage-blended pre-2019 and reported separately in the member layer.

5Named communities ≥ 100 lots

Every community of 100 lots or more identified in the transaction and notice record, with the verification basis stated per line — the same confidence discipline members see on every record in the data layer.

TABLE 2
CommunityCounty · CityLotsStageBuilders (from records)Basis
Tehaleh (Cascadia EBPC)Pierce · Bonney Lake~9,700 at full buildout (~5,000 remaining est.)Active buildoutBrookfield (dev), Century, MainVue, Lennar, D.R. Horton, Richmond, othersWeb-verified
Sunrise (Master Planned Community)Pierce · Puyallup/South Hill~5,200 approved; ~900 remainingActive buildoutKB Home, Richmond American, Century, Lennar, D.R. Horton, OakridgeWeb-verified
Ten Trails / Black Diamond (Lawson Hills)King · Black Diamond~4,000 remaining (MPD)Active buildoutOakpointe (dev), Lennar, Richmond, Pulte, othersData + report
Lakepointe Urban VillageKing · Covington1,500Pre-ApplicationOakpointe BuildersData + report
Eastview VillageSnohomish · Snohomish (uninc., Cathcart)1,301–1,320 (574 SF + 360 TH + MF)ApprovedLitigationD.R. Horton, Pacific Ridge Homes, Forestar (land)Web-verified
Wolf RiverPierce · Graham535Pre-ApplicationLennar NorthwestData-derived
Avalon AlderwoodSnohomish · Lynnwood491UnknownAvalon Alderwood (entity)Data-derived
Brookdale PDDPierce · Tacoma388Pre-ApplicationIchijo USA (Japanese builder)Data-derived
Marysville 10 DegreesSnohomish · Marysville335Pre-ApplicationArroyo Cap IVData-derived
Villas at ArlingtonSnohomish · Arlington312Permit/HearingVillas at Arlington PartnersData-derived
Timber Creek Ranch (PRD)Snohomish · Bothell290 (221 rec.)Under ReviewToll BrothersData-derived
Cathcart CrossingSnohomish · Snohomish (uninc.)286Under ReviewD.R. Horton, Pacific RidgeWeb-verified
Mountain Highway EastPierce · Spanaway259Pre-ApplicationBlue Fern DevelopmentData-derived
Wyndham HighlandsSnohomish · Sultan213Under ReviewAG Essential Housing (land bank)Data-derived
SkyRidge EstatesSnohomish · Sultan207Pre-ApplicationLGI HomesData-derived
Diamond Valley EstatesKing · Auburn202Under ReviewMainVueData-derived
Suntop PUDKing · Enumclaw174Permit/HearingLGI HomesData-derived
Falling Water(s)Pierce · Bonney Lake164 (part of larger KB program)Permit/HearingKB HomeData + report
18 communities of 100+ lots in the registry; the full registry with per-line evidence links is in the member data layer.

6What this data can and cannot say

Honest qualifications

  • Not every land-use notice could be parsed to a lot count. Pipeline figures are audited floors, not censuses.
  • Multiple Snohomish lot bases circulate in prior research. This report publishes the de-duplicated basis; a one-page crosswalk reconciles the rest.
  • "New construction" counts recordings (a supply proxy); "resale" counts closed sales (demand). Any share statistic mixing the two is labeled where used.
  • Prices are stage-blended unless explicitly marked finished-lot. A blended $/lot is not a finished-lot comp.
  • 2026 figures are partial-year and are never charted or averaged as full years.

7Sources & methods

  1. Title-plant transaction record, 2011–2026. Plat-linked acquisitions and finished-lot sales with buyer, seller, and price per lot; stated margin of error ±2%. De-duplication: one record per plat, kept at largest lot count; audited corrections applied.
  2. County land-use notice registers, King · Pierce · Snohomish. Notice-stage rebuild, de-duplicated to one record per project; per-line confidence tiers (Verified / Partial / Directional).
  3. NWMLS monthly statistics. Inventory and pending-sale series; reproduced under attribution terms.
  4. County recorded-deed publications. Independent benchmark for the lot-to-home-price ratio.
  5. Third-party research informs internal analysis and is cited, not reproduced — license terms apply.

Members search the underlying records — every plat transaction, every finished-lot sale, the full notice-stage pipeline — and export any result set to CSV.

Every number here is a query away.

Members search the underlying records — 3,194 plat transactions, 1,570 finished-lot sales, the full notice-stage pipeline — and export any result set to CSV.

Member sign in →